Link building has a bad reputation because most of it deserves one. Bulk links from directories and private blog networks still show up in a lot of "SEO packages", and they are the fastest way to get a site flagged instead of ranked. What I do is slower and less scalable on purpose: manual outreach to sites that actually have authority to pass.
Link building is earning links from relevant sites that real people read, so that your key pages rank. Mine is manual: I research targets, write each pitch myself, and report what landed.
| Deliverable | What it is |
|---|---|
| Target list | Sites ranked by relevance and real traffic, not only a DA score |
| Outreach log | Pitches sent, replies and follow-ups |
| Placements | Each live link, with the URL, the page it points to and the anchor |
| Report | New referring domains tied to the pages you want to rank, and what changed in rankings |
I do not promise a link count up front. A good link from the right site is worth more than ten mediocre ones.
I will not buy placements, use link networks or private blog networks, or submit your site to bulk directories. Google's spam policies treat link schemes as violations, and the risk lands on your domain, not mine.
What you have now, what is working, and what is actually hurting you.
Built from relevance and real traffic, not just a DA score.
This is the slow part, and I will not pretend otherwise. I research each site, write a personal pitch, follow up once, and log everything.
What landed, what is pending, and what changed in your rankings.
I built the tools that run technical checks, and I take the same careful approach to my own site: no bought links, and a backlink profile I monitor instead of hide.
Sites with solid content and technical foundations that are still underperforming on competitive terms, usually because the authority side has not been worked. Not a fit if you are looking for guaranteed link counts in 30 days: that is the kind of promise that gets sites penalized.
I will not give a number upfront. A good link from the right site is worth more than ten mediocre ones, and chasing a quota is how people end up buying bad links. I will tell you what is realistic once I see your niche and current profile.
No one honestly can, since the sites you are pitching decide, not me. What I guarantee is the outreach quality and the targeting.
No. Paid placements and link networks are link schemes under Google's spam policies, and they put your domain at risk.
Usually months, depending on competition and on how strong the links are. I report on new referring domains first and rankings second.
Common, and usually for the reasons described on this page: bulk, automated, low-quality links. Send me the backlink profile and I will tell you honestly what state it is in.
Specific pages, tied to what is actually supposed to rank. Spreading links evenly across a site with no strategy behind it does not work as well as people think.
Usually not. Google says it ignores most spam links. A disavow file only matters if you have a manual action or a clear pattern of links you paid for. I will check which applies.
Send me your backlink profile and I will give you a straight read on it.
Apply to Work TogetherThis site uses cookies for essential functionality and basic analytics. See the Privacy Policy for details.